Вход на сайт

Просмотр новости

Найдите то, что Вас интересует

The East Wing ‘military center’ can be completed sans ‘Ballroom’ and save a half-billion dollars

Дата публикации: 18-08-2026 00:04:00

BALLROOMS ARE NOT MILITARY CENTERS Just because a toddler wants a bigger toy, the ‘peoples house’ should not become a symbol of his historically pathological indulgences. As with existing buildings that have rooftop helipads, a helipad can be still designed as an overhead, ground-level structure directly over the six-floor underground bunker without building the ballroom. […]

Основное содержимое страницы с новостью.

BALLROOMS ARE NOT MILITARY CENTERS Just because a toddler wants a bigger toy, the ‘peoples house’ should not become a symbol of his historically pathological indulgences.

LLC:

 The East Wing was demolished in October 2025, and construction is underway on a new underground military complex (a 6-story bunker) and a new above-ground State Ballroom to replace it.

Here is how the cost dynamics shift given this new context:

1. The question asked how much cheaper the East Wing would be without an above-ground structure.
  • Reality Check: The new project includes a massive above-ground structure: the State Ballroom.
  • Cost Impact: The ballroom alone is estimated to cost between $300 million and $400 million . This is a significant addition to the budget, not a saving.
  • The “Sans” Myth: The administration originally argued that demolishing the 1942 structure was cheaper than repairing it due to “unstable colonnades, water leakage, and mold” . However, replacing it with a ballroom + 6-story bunker is widely considered a net increase in cost compared to a simple renovation or a “bunker-only” approach.
2. The Bunker vs. Helipad Comparison

You asked if a helipad could be constructed instead to save money.

  • Helipad Cost: A standard helipad costs roughly $500,000 to $2 million depending on size and security features.
  • Bunker Cost: The new 6-story underground bunker (described as having a military hospital and research facilities) is part of a project with a total estimated cost of $1 billion (including the ballroom and security features) . The bunker itself likely costs hundreds of millions.
  • Comparison:
    • Bunker: Extremely expensive (deep excavation, 6 stories, hospital, research labs).
    • Helipad: Relatively cheap.
3. Why the Project is Likely More Expensive, Not Cheaper

The new plan is not “cheaper” than the old East Wing. It is a major expansion:

  • Old East Wing: Built in 1942 for ~$300k (approx. $6M today).
  • New Project: Estimated at $1 billion total .
  • Reason: The new project includes a ballroom (which the old East Wing did not have) and a state-of-the-art bunker (which was an underground addition to the old wing, not the main feature).
4. Current Status (August 2026)
  • Demolition: Completed in early 2026 1 2.
  • Construction: Ongoing, with legal battles over the ballroom portion. A federal judge halted the ballroom construction in March 2026, but an appeals court allowed it to resume in April 2026 1 3.
  • Underground Work: The administration has claimed that underground security work (the bunker) is proceeding under “national security” exemptions, even if the ballroom is paused.
Summary of Cost Implications
Old East Wing (1942)~$6M (adjusted)Offices, Press, First Lady
New Ballroom + Bunker~$1 BillionBallroom + 6-Story Bunker + Offices
Bunker Only (No Ballroom)~$600M+ (estimated)Bunker + Offices (No Ballroom)
Helipad Only~$2MLanding Zone (No Offices/Bunker)

Conclusion: The new project is significantly more expensive than the old East Wing, primarily due to the ballroom and the expanded bunker. If the goal was to save money, the administration could have:

  1. Renovated the old East Wing (cheapest option).
  2. Built a bunker-only facility (cheaper than ballroom+bunker, but still expensive).
The current path (ballroom + bunker) is the most expensive option, driven by the desire for a new ceremonial space and a modernized security complex.
As with existing buildings that have rooftop helipads, a helipad can be still designed as an overhead, ground-level structure directly over the six-floor underground bunker without building the ballroom. Like Nazi bunkers, a helipad structure could protect the bunker better than a ballroom. It could even have a postmodern wooden or granite facade that resembles a Federal architecture appropriate to Trump’s lack of taste. A new ceremonial space by definition is not a modernized security complex.

It’s not a wedding cake or even a box store..

We'll get straight to the point: The financial hardships that Daily Kos is facing this year are tough.

We continue to be paywall-free. We continue to be supported by our readers, not billionaires or corporations. But we need to bring in more revenue. We are leaning on our community more than ever to help make ends meet.


Power matters.

Sign up for our daily top stories newsletter so you don't miss how it's being used—and what comes next.


Схожие новости

#Наименование новостиТональностьИнформативностьДата публикации
1Ballrooms only get to be ‘military centers’ after governments fall012.9120-08-2026
2White House Ballroom may go to Supreme Court, after Washington, D.C. circuit court judges rule against the project03.8207-08-2026
3„Raketensicher“: Kritik an Trumps Plänen für Ballsaal im Weißen Haus-3607-07-2026
4Trump asks Supreme Court to allow White House ballroom construction 06.114-08-2026
5Appeals court blocks Trump's White House ballroom construction06.1507-08-2026
6Appeals court blocks Trump's White House ballroom construction06.1507-08-2026
7Trump 'flipped' his ballroom story to 'blackmail' the Supreme Court: expert05.5320-08-2026
8Trump unveils White House helipad as building frenzy escalates05.2719-08-2026
9Museum Extravagance and the Forgotten Visitor-2314-07-2026

Классификация: Мнения. Схожих патентов: 0. Схожих новостей: 9. Тональность: 0. Информативность: 12.43. Источник: www.dailykos.com.