Вход на сайт

Просмотр новости

Найдите то, что Вас интересует

Reporters Committee statement on subpoena issued to New York Times freelancer

Дата публикации: 01-08-2026 18:39:02

New reporting from The New York Times indicates that a freelancer has been fighting a subpoena he received in February of this year after reporting about a failed Navy SEAL Team 6 mission that took place in 2019. Between 2001 and the beginning of the second Trump administration, the Department of Justice issued grand jury […]
The post Reporters Committee statement on subpoena issued to New York Times freelancer appeared first on The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.


Основное содержимое страницы с новостью.

New reporting from The New York Times indicates that a freelancer has been fighting a subpoena he received in February of this year after reporting about a failed Navy SEAL Team 6 mission that took place in 2019.

Between 2001 and the beginning of the second Trump administration, the Department of Justice issued grand jury subpoenas seeking to force reporters to appear in person and reveal their confidential sources in three national security leak cases: Judith Miller and Matthew CooperMike Levine, and James Risen (who received a trial subpoena as well). The department has also sought to identify sources and obtain confidential information in national security leak cases through search warrants as well as by metadata demands using subpoenas or court orders.

In response, Reporters Committee President Bruce D. Brown made the following statement:

“In the last 25 years, there have only been three attempts in national security leaks cases to force reporters to name their sources and now we have four attempts — that we know of — in the space of a few months, two of them directed at news stories published in the Times.

“Whether the investigative journalism the public relies on comes from staff reporters, or from solo newsletter writers, this news of yet another grand jury subpoena, this one served on freelancer Matthew Cole, makes it very clear that the protections that shield the institutional press from government snooping into confidential source relationships are equally vital for independent journalists.

“The public should be alarmed, the reporters will stay resolute.”

Схожие новости

#Наименование новостиТональностьИнформативностьДата публикации
1In re application of The New York Times & Reporters Committee to unseal judicial records ancillary to grand jury subpoena of Matthew Cole03.3519-08-2026
2Quashed: Reporters Committee attorney helps Indiana journalist fend off subpoena06.0317-09-2026
3New York Times files motion to quash subpoenas served on journalists over Air Force One coverage0716-07-2026
4Trump takes New York Times fight up a notch with DOJ subpoenas  0515-07-2026
5Multiple New York Times reporters issued subpoenas over Air Force One reporting0511-07-2026
6New York Times lawyer talks about DOJ withdrawing subpoenas sent to Times' reporters03.9124-07-2026
7Federal court should dismiss charges against independent journalists Georgia Fort, Don Lemon06.5512-08-2026
8Trump rails against 'maggot' and 'flunky' NYT journalists as DOJ subpoenas newspaper over incendiary Air Force One report-8511-07-2026
9New York Times accuses agency of political retaliation in countersuit over discrimination case0710-07-2026

Классификация: Международные. Схожих патентов: 0. Схожих новостей: 9. Тональность: 0. Информативность: 7.12. Источник: www.rcfp.org.