Вход на сайт

Просмотр новости

Найдите то, что Вас интересует

The “readily available” second-line antibiotics are more cost-effective than the “easily accessible” first-line antibiotics as the initial management of Urinary Tract Infections and Chorioamnionitis in Malawi [version 2; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]

Дата публикации: 17-09-2026 13:13:48

Background Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has health and economic implications for patients, healthcare providers, and the society. In Malawi, infections, including AMR, account for 22% of the maternal mortality. Economic evaluation of AMR is required to understand the cost-benefits of bacterial infection treatment strategies and antibiotic prescriptions for maternal infections and AMR. Notably, evidence of the comparative cost-effectiveness of commonly used antibiotics for maternal infection treatment is scarce. Methods Using a decision tree model, we assessed the cost-effectiveness of second-line antibiotics (ciprofloxacin and ceftriaxone) against first-line antibiotics (amoxicillin, gentamicin, and ampicillin) for the management of maternal infections in Malawi. The analysis considered both outpatient (urinary tract infection) and inpatient (chorioamnionitis) scenarios. Results The results indicate that the “readily available” second-line antibiotics have a cost advantage, with incremental-cost-effectiveness-ratios (ICERs) below Malawi’s GDP per capita (634.8 USD/capita). A total of 0.157cents per infection were resolved for urinary tract infection and 0.673 cents per infection were resolved for chorioamnionitis. Conclusion This study provides short-term, static insights into the cost-effectiveness of antibiotic treatment strategies for maternal bacterial infections like UTI and chorioamnionitis in Malawi and similar low-resource settings. Healthcare providers should weigh cost advantage against clinical consequence when: 1) prescribing readily available, easily accessible Access-group antibiotics as first-line treatment, and 2) transitioning patients with confirmed non-response to less accessible, second-line Watch-group agents. Because wider second-line use drives resistance, switching should be guided by susceptibility testing, not adopted by default.

Схожие новости

#Наименование новостиТональностьИнформативностьДата публикации
1Surveillance-Driven Machine Learning for Prediction of Antimicrobial Susceptibility: An Explainable Modeling Framework using the Pfizer ATLAS Dataset (2004 - 2023) [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 not approved]013.8821-09-2026
2Strengthening systems to monitor antibiotics. An action oriented approach [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]08.2524-09-2026
3Evaluating the 7-1-7 Outbreak Response Metric: Modelling and Implementation Insights for Ebola, Measles, and Anthrax in Central and Eastern Uganda, 2025 [version 2; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]011.412-09-2026
4Understanding Antecedents and Attributes in the Context of Upward Referral for Obstetric Emergencies: A Grounded Theory Study [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]07.3402-03-2026
5Process mapping of a collaborative quality improvement study to optimise the use of antibiotics in intensive care units in Argentina: a Pathfinder study [version 2; peer review: 1 approved]06.8322-09-2026
6How cheap drones are rewriting the economics of war08.8228-09-2026
7Bloodstream-associated Salmonella Typhimurium and Enteritidis iNTS pathovariants hyper-replicate in human macrophages [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]08.915-09-2026
8Parkland study could change how hospitals treat a leading cause of maternal, infant mortality06.6108-09-2026
9Cost of having a baby: Hospital bills are shockingly high in states you wouldn't expect012.4426-09-2026
10Cost of having a baby: Hospital bills are shockingly high in states you wouldn't expect012.4426-09-2026

Классификация: . Схожих патентов: 0. Схожих новостей: 10. Тональность: 0. Информативность: 9.64. Источник: wellcomeopenresearch.org.