"Stranger Things" in the 2026 Arctic
The continuation of cool and stormy conditions over the Arctic Ocean during September bookends the strange summer of 2026. While global air temperatures were at or near record highs for June, July, and August, the summer was cool and stormy over the Arctic Ocean. The Arctic sea ice minimum extent tied for tenth lowest on the satellite record with 2008, 2010, and 2025, with a loose ice pack on the Atlantic side extending to the pole. However, the post-minimum freeze up has been rapid. Antarctic sea ice extent, which reached its maximum on September 14, dropped sharply through September, hitting record low daily extents since October 2.Overview of conditionsArctic sea ice extent for September 2026 averaged 4.81 million square kilometers (1.86 million square miles), thirteenth lowest in the satellite record (Figure 1a). This monthly average extent was 1.6 million square kilometers (618,000 square miles) below the 1981 to 2010 average (Figure 1b). Since the seasonal sea ice minimum that occurred on September 12, tying for tenth lowest in the satellite record, extent as of early October remains below average along the Eurasian coast, especially in the Kara and Barents Seas. While the Northern Sea route appears to be largely free of ice, significant ice remains in the southern (Amundsen’s) route of the Northwest Passage. Heavy ice cover blocks M’Clure Strait, the west end of the deepwater northern route. While a loose icepack in over the Atlantic side of the Arctic Ocean allowed the Swedish icebreaker Oden to reach the North Pole, open water areas quickly refroze after the seasonal sea ice minimum, and as of early October, extent had risen to the lower interdecile range of extents in the satellite record.
Figure 1a. Arctic sea ice extent for September 2026 was 4.81 million square kilometers (1.86 million square miles). The magenta line shows the 1981 to 2010 average extent for that month. Sea Ice Index data. About the data — Credit: National Snow and Ice Data CenterFigure 1b. This graph shows Arctic sea ice extent as of October 5, 2026, along with daily ice extent data for four previous years and the record low year. 2026 is shown in blue, 2025 in green, 2024 in orange, 2023 in brown, 2022 in magenta, and 2012 in dashed brown. The 1981 to 2010 median is in dark gray. The gray areas around the median line show the interquartile and interdecile ranges of the data. Sea Ice Index data. — Credit: National Snow and Ice Data CenterConditions in contextAs was the case for all of summer (see summer summary below), low sea level pressure dominated the Arctic Ocean during September, accompanied by below-average temperatures that fostered rapid ice growth (Figure 2a). Air temperatures at the 925 hPa level (about 2,500 feet above the surface) were 0 to 1 degree Celsius (0 to 2 degrees Fahrenheit) below average over much of the Arctic Ocean, but strongly above average over northern Eurasia (Figure 2b).
Figure 2a. This plot shows average sea level pressure in the Arctic in hectopascals for September 2026. Yellows and reds indicate high air pressure; blues and purples indicate low pressure. — Credit: NSIDC courtesy NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory Physical Sciences LaboratoryFigure 2b. This plot shows the departure from average air temperature in the Arctic at the 925 hPa level, in degrees Celsius, for September 2026. Yellows and reds indicate above average temperatures; blues and purples indicate below average temperatures. — Credit: NSIDC courtesy NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory Physical Sciences LaboratorySeptember 2026 compared to previous yearsThe downward linear trend in September Arctic sea ice extent through 2026 is 74,100 square kilometers (28,600 square miles) per year or 11.6 percent per decade relative to the 1981 to 2010 average (Figure 3). Based on the linear trend, since 1979, September has lost 3.24 million square kilometers (1.25 million square miles) of sea ice. This is equivalent to twice the size of Alaska.
Figure 3. Monthly September ice extent for 1979 to 2026 shows a decline of 11.6 percent per decade.
— Credit:
National Snow and Ice Data Center
Regional contributions to September extentFor this monthly post, we present a time series of September monthly ice extents in a new format (Figure 4). The black line depicts the overall trend. Regional differences from average for each year are shown as colored bars for each sector of the Arctic. This presents the data in a way that allows some insight into the contributions to the overall positive or negative September extent difference from average. Since 2007, with few exceptions, differences from average have been negative in all sectors; in the last century, regional differences were more varied. Since 2007, negative differences from average in the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas and in the East Siberian and Laptev Seas have remained prominent, but their magnitudes have shifted from year to year largely in response to shifting summer weather patterns.
Figure 4. This time series shows Arctic sea ice extent for the month of September as a whole (black line) along with regional differences from the 1981 to 2010 average for every year since 1979.
— Credit:
J. Stroeve, National Snow and Ice Data Center
Spring in the AntarcticAfter reaching its maximum extent on September 14, Antarctic sea ice extent sharply declined, and as of October 6, was close to the record low for the date set in 2023. As was done for the Arctic, a graph presents the September Antarctic sea ice extent time series along with differences from average for each year (Figure 5). While the low extents since 2022 stand out clearly, in each of these low years, extent was above average in some sectors. This stands in sharp contrast to the Arctic. Note how in 2022, extent was above average in the Ross Sea, shifting to below average in 2023. However, during the record maximum extents of 2012 to 2015, nearly all regions showed a positive difference from average.
Figure 5. This time series shows Antarctic sea ice extent for the month of September as a whole (black line) along with regional differences from the 1981 to 2010 average for each year since 1979.
— Credit:
J. Stroeve, National Snow and Ice Data Center
The 2026 summer melt season in summaryThe 2026 melt season in the Arctic was unusual in the extreme. Through most of May, extent was tracking at near record low levels. Starting in June, the pace of ice loss substantially slowed, and the minimum extent, which occurred on September 12, ended up as tenth lowest in the satellite record, tying with 2008, 2010, and 2025. Nevertheless, the loose ice pack on the Atlantic side of the Arctic Ocean, extending nearly to the North Pole, eased the voyage of the Swedish icebreaker Oden to the pole, carrying scientists along with tourists.A highly stormy atmospheric pattern over the central Arctic Ocean attended by cool and cloudy conditions inhibited sea ice melt. A pronounced average low pressure centered near the North Pole lingered in June, July, and August (Figure 6a). While cyclone activity over the central Arctic Ocean tends to be maximized in summer, the persistence of this cyclonic pattern was remarkable. In summer, in “free drift” conditions, where there is little floe-to-floe interaction, cyclonic (counterclockwise) winds promote the spreading of the sea ice cover, which likely accounts for the loose ice conditions just noted. Past research shows that summer cyclones that enter the Arctic Ocean, especially from Eurasia and mature in their passage, develop a cold-cored structure. Each cyclone moving into the region reinforces the persistent cold-cored, low structure, which extends into the tropopause much like a vertical stack. Interestingly, based on the ERA5 reanalysis, despite all the cyclones, summer precipitation over the Arctic Ocean as a whole was not notably above average. The attendant pattern of summer air temperature as a difference from average at the 925 millibar level (about 2,500 feet above the surface) was equally unusual (Figure 6b). When sea ice cover is melting, air temperatures will hover around the freezing point. However, over much of the ocean, temperatures remained below average. This was especially clear in June when melt started late. While temperatures over the ocean reflected the cold-cored nature of cyclone maximum and extensive cloud cover, temperatures on Arctic land were far above average over the Canadian Arctic Archipelago, western Europe, and central Eurasia.
Figure 6a. This plot shows average sea level pressure in the Arctic in millibars for June, July, and August. Yellows and reds indicate high air pressure; blues and purples indicate low pressure. — Credit: NSIDC courtesy NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory Physical Sciences LaboratoryFigure 6b. This plot shows the departure from average air temperature in the Arctic at the 925 hPa level, in degrees Celsius, for the months of June, July, and August. Yellows and reds indicate above average temperatures; blues and purples indicate below average temperatures. — Credit: NSIDC courtesy NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory Physical Sciences LaboratoryThe cyclonic pattern persisted through September. After reaching its sea ice minimum on September 12, autumn freeze up was rapid, and as of this post, extent had reached the lowest decile in the satellite record.This cyclonic pattern also played a role in the late melt out of the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas. Unusual compared to recent years, sea ice remained near the Alaskan coast into August, which is near the location of the 1981 to 2010 average. However, the ice melted rapidly and by the end of August, the region was largely ice free in the passive microwave data (though operational ice charts indicated low concentration ice).Relatively cool conditions and cyclonic pressure contributed to the late ice loss. The reason that the ice eventually did melt was because the area was dominated by first-year ice, which is thinner and more susceptible to melt out completely (Figure 6c). Overall, the Arctic sea ice cover has much less multiyear ice and thus is thinner than it was during the 1980s. Since 2007, at the end of the summer melt season, the multiyear extent has varied between 1.3 million and 1.9 million square kilometers (502,000 square miles and 734,000 square miles), significantly lower than the roughly 3.5 million square kilometers (1.35 million square miles) during the 1980s. And since 2012, the oldest, thickest ice (greater than 4-years old) has nearly disappeared, with 250,000 square kilometers (97,000 square miles) or less each year compared to the approximate 1.5 million square kilometers (579,000 square miles) before 2005. While this summer was relatively cool over the Arctic Ocean, the long-term warming trend has resulted in more melt and faster distribution of sea ice, which means that ice is not surviving nearly as long as it used to.
Figure 6c. The top left map shows Arctic sea ice age during the week of March 12 to 18, 2026, the week of the maximum extent; a larger swath of first-year ice extends into the Beaufort Sea, though older ice is found near the coast. The top right map shows Arctic sea ice age during the week of September 3 to 9, 2026, just before the minimum extent; most of the ice in the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas has melted out. The bottom time series shows extent of multiyear ice in black and ice greater than 4-years old in red at the seasonal minimum for 1985 to 2026. The oldest ice (in red) shows substantial decline.
— Credit:
Tschudi et al., 2019a and 2019b
Sea ice in the Antarctic remained below the lowest interdecile range since the beginning of the austral growth season that started in late March 2026, but above the record low of 2023 (Figure 6d). The maximum extent, reached on September 14, was the third lowest in the satellite record, repeating a recent pattern of low maximum extents discussed in more detail above. Since October 2, extent has fallen to record low daily values, surpassing 2023’s records. The post-maximum areas of loss are in the Ross and Amundsen seas, and the Indian Ocean sector (Figure 6e).
Figure 6d. The graph above shows Antarctic sea ice extent as of October 6, 2026, along with daily ice extent data for four previous years and the record 2014 year. 2026 is shown in blue, 2025 in green, 2024 in orange, 2023 in brown, 2022 in magenta, and 2014 in dashed brown. The 1981 to 2010 median is in dark gray. The gray areas around the median line show the interquartile and interdecile ranges of the data. Sea Ice Index data. — Credit: National Snow and Ice Data CenterFigure 6e. Antarctic sea ice extent for September 2026 was 17.32 million square kilometers (6.69 million square miles). The magenta line shows the 1981 to 2010 average extent for that month. Sea Ice Index data. About the data — Credit: National Snow and Ice Data Center
agnieszka.gaut…
Wed, 10/07/2026 - 14:00
Article Type
Analysis - Sea Ice Today
Publish Date
Wed, 10/07/2026 - 12:00
Geophysical Measurement
Sea ice
Featured Image
sept2026_arctic.png
Anchor links
On
News & Updates
Off
Similar Items
Off
Section
Sea Ice Today
Subject
Climate Change
Data
Weather
Geographical Area
Antarctica
Northern Hemisphere
Arctic
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 2026
As NSIDC reflects on 50 years in operation, past and present NSIDC researchers round up their favorite and most impactful publications. Also included are NSIDC contributions to annual reports: the Arctic Report Card and the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society’s State of the Climate.
John CassanoCassano, J.J., M.A. Nigro, M.W. Seefeldt, M. Katurji, K. Guinn, G. Williams, and A. DuVivier. 2021. Antarctic atmospheric boundary layer observations with the Small Unmanned Meteorological Observer (SUMO). Earth System Science Data 13: 969-982. doi:10.5194/essd-13-969-2021.
Rinke, A., J.J. Cassano, E.N. Cassano, R. Jaiser, and D. Handorf. 2021. Meteorological conditions during the MOSAiC expedition: Normal or anomalous? Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene 9(1): 00023. doi:10.1525/elementa.2021.00023.
Jozef, G.C., J.J. Cassano, S. Dahlke, M. Dice, C.J. Cox, and G. de Boer. 2024. An overview of the vertical structure of the atmospheric boundary layer in the central Arctic during MOSAiC. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 24: 1429-1450. doi:10.5194/acp-24-1429-2024.
Valkonen, E., J. Cassano, E. Cassano, M. Seefeldt, and C. Parker. 2025. CMIP6 representation of declining sea ice and Arctic cyclones in the current climate. Journal of Geophysical Research 130: e2024JD042388. doi:10.1029/2024JD042388.
Zhang, C., J.J. Cassano, M. Seefeldt, H. Wang, W. Ma, and W.-W. Tung. 2025. Quantifying the impacts of atmospheric rivers on the surface energy budget of the Arctic based on reanalysis. The Cryosphere 19: 4671-4699. doi:10.5194/tc-19-4671-2025.
This photo shows a small unpiloted aerial system outside of McMurdo Station, Antarctica, as shown in Antarctic atmospheric boundary layer observations with the Small Unmanned Meteorological Observer (SUMO). — Credit: Cassano et al. 2021. doi:10.5194/essd-13-969-2021 Florence FettererWalsh, J.E., F. Fetterer, J.S. Stewart, and W.L. Chapman. 2017. A database for depicting Arctic sea ice variations back to 1850. Geographical Review 107. doi:10.1111/j.1931-0846.2016.12195.x.
Posey P.G., E.J. Metzger, A.J. Wallcraft, D.A. Hebert, R.A. Allard, O.M. Smedstad, M.W. Phelps, F. Fetterer, J.S. Stewart, W.N. Meier, and S.R. Helfrich. 2015. Improving Arctic sea ice edge forecasts by assimilating high horizontal resolution sea ice concentration data into the US Navy's ice forecast systems. Cryosphere 9: 1735-1745. doi:10.5194/tc-9-1735-2015.
Mahoney, A.R., R.G. Barry, V. Smolyanitsky, and F. Fetterer. 2008. Observed sea ice extent in the Russian Arctic, 1933–2006. Journal of Geophysical Research 113: C11005. doi:10.1029/2008JC004830.
Siri Jodha Singh KhalsaKhalsa, S.J.S. , M.B. Dyurgerov, T. Khromova, B.H. Raup, and R.G. Barry. 2004. Space-based mapping of glacier changes using ASTER and GIS tools. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 42(10): 2177-2183. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2004.834636.
Raup, B., A. Kääb, J.S. Kargel, M.P. Bishop, G. Hamilton, E. Lee, F. Paul, F. Rau, D. Soltesz, S.J.S. Khalsa, M. Beedle, and C. Helm. 2007. Remote sensing and GIS technology in the Global Land Ice Measurements from Space (GLIMS) Project. Computers & Geosciences 33(1): 104-125. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2006.05.015.
Alia KhanArmstrong, R.L., K. Rittger, M. J. Brodzik, A. Racoviteanu, A. P. Barrett, S.J.S. Khalsa, B. Raup, A.F. Hill, A.L. Khan, A.M. Wilson, R.B. Kayastha, F. Fetterer, and B. Armstrong. 2019. Runoff from glacier ice and seasonal snow in High Asia: separating melt water sources in river flow. Regional Environmental Change 19: 1249-1261. doi:10.1007/s10113-018-1429-0.
Khan, A.L., S. Wagner, R. Jaffe, P. Xian, M. Williams, R. Armstrong, and D. McKnight. 2017. Dissolved black carbon in the global cryosphere: Concentrations and chemical signatures. Geophysical Research Letters 44: 6226-6234. doi:10.1002/2017GL073485.
Khan, A.L. H.M. Dierssen, T.A. Scambos, J. Höfer, and R.R. Cordero. 2021. Spectral characterization, radiative forcing and pigment content of coastal Antarctic snow algae: approaches to spectrally discriminate red and green communities and their impact on snowmelt. The Cryosphere 15: 133-148. doi:10.5194/tc-15-133-2021.
Healy, S.M., and A.L. Khan. 2023. Albedo change from snow algae blooms can contribute substantially to snow melt in the North Cascades, USA. Communications Earth & Environment 4: 142. doi:10.1038/s43247-023-00768-8.
Walt MeierStroeve, J., M.M. Holland, W. Meier, T. Scambos, and M. Serreze. 2007. Arctic sea ice decline: Faster than forecast. Geophysical Research Letters 34: L09501. doi:10.1029/2007GL029703.
Stroeve, J.C., V. Kattsov, A. Barrett, M. Serreze, T. Pavlova, M. Holland, and W.N. Meier. 2012. Trends in Arctic sea ice extent from CMIP5, CMIP3 and observations. Geophysical Research Letters 39: L16502, doi:10.1029/2012GL052676.
Meier, W.N., A. Petty, S. Hendricks, A. Bliss, L. Kaleschke, D. Divine, S. Farrell, S. Gerland, D. Perovich, R. Ricker, X. Tian-Kunze, and M. Webster. 2025. Sea Ice. Arctic Report Card 2025 doi:10.25923/mmxf-0r86.
Meier, W.N., D. Gallaher, and G.G. Campbell. 2013. New estimates of Arctic and Antarctic sea ice extent from recovered Nimbus I satellite imagery. The Cryosphere 7: 699-705. doi:10.5194/tc-7-699-2013.
Meier, W.N., G. Hovelsrud, B. van Oort, J. Key, K. Kovacs, C. Michel, M. Granskog, S. Gerland, D. Perovich, A.P. Makshtas, and J. Reist. 2014. Arctic sea ice in transformation: A review of recent observed changes and impacts on biology and human activity. Reviews of Geophysics 52, 185–217. doi:10.1002/2013RG000431.
Meier, W.N., J.S. Stewart, A. Windnagel, and F.M. Fetterer. 2022. Comparison of hemispheric and regional sea ice extent and area trends from NOAA and NASA passive microwave-derived climate records. Remote Sensing 14(3): 619. doi:10.3390/rs14030619.
Meier, W.N., J. Stroeve, and F. Fetterer. 2007. Whither Arctic sea ice? A clear signal of decline regionally, seasonally and extending beyond the satellite record. Annals of Glaciology 46: 428-434. doi:10.3189/172756407782871170.
Twila MoonLaidre, K.L., M.A. Supple, E.W. Born, E.V. Regehr, Ø. Wiig, F. Ugarte, J. Aars, R. Dietz, C. Sonne, P. Hegelund, C. Isaksen, G.B. Akse, B. Cohen, H.L. Stern, T. Moon, C. Vollmers, R. Corbett-Detig, D. Paetkau, and B. Shapiro. 2022. Glacial ice supports a distinct and undocumented polar bear subpopulation persisting in late 21st-century sea-ice conditions. Science 376(6599): 1333-1338. doi:10.1126/science.abk2793.
Moon, T.A., D.A. Sutherland, D. Carroll, D. Felikson, L. Kehrl, and F. Straneo. 2017. Subsurface iceberg melt key to Greenland fjord freshwater budget. Nature Geoscience 11: 49-54. doi:10.1038/s41561-017-0018-z.
Moon, T.A., I. Overeem, M. Druckenmiller, M. Holland, H. Huntington, G. Kling, A.L. Lovecraft, G. Miller, T. Scambos, C. Schädel, E.A.G. Schuur, E. Trochim, F. Wiese, D. Williams, and G. Wong. 2019. The expanding footprint of rapid Arctic change. Earth’s Future 7: 212-218. doi:10.1029/2018EF001088.
Siegert, M., H. Sevestre, M.J. Bentley, J. Brigham-Grette, H. Burgess, S. Buzzard, M. Cavitte, S.L. Chown, F. Colleoni, R.M. DeConto, H.A. Fricker, E. Gasson, S.M. Grant, A.M. Gulisano, S. Hancock, K.R. Hendry, S.F. Henley, R. Hock, K.A. Hughes, D. Karentz, J.D. Kirkham, B. Kulessa, R.D. Larter, A., Mackintosh, V. Masson-Delmotte, F.S. McCormack, H. Millman, R. Mottram, T.A. Moon, T. Naish, C. Nath, B. Orlove, P. Pearson, J. Rogelj, J. Rumble, S. Seabrook, A. Silvano, M. Sommerkorn, L.A. Stearns, C.R. Stokes, J. Stroeve, and M. Truffer. 2025. Safeguarding the polar regions from dangerous geoengineering: a critical assessment of proposed concepts and future prospects. Frontiers in Science 3: 1527393. doi:10.3389/fsci.2025.1527393.
Gold A.U., E.M. Geraghty Ward, C.L. Marsh, T.A. Moon, S.W. Schoeneman, A.L. Khan, and M.K. Littrell. 2023. Measuring novice-expert sense of place for a far-away place: Implications for geoscience instruction. PLoS ONE 18(10): e0293003. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0293003.
Ted ScambosScambos, T.A, and M.A. Fahnestock. 1998. Improving digital elevation models over ice sheets using AVHRR-based photoclinometry. Journal of Glaciology 44(146): 97-103. doi:10.3189/S0022143000002392.
Scambos, T.A., J.A. Bohlander, C.A. Shuman, and P. Skvarca. 2004. Glacier acceleration and thinning after ice shelf collapse in the Larsen B embayment, Antarctica. Geophysical Research Letters 31(18). doi:10.1029/2004GL020670.
Scambos, T.A., T.M. Haran, M.A. Fahnestock, T.H. Painter, and J. Bohlander. 2007. MODIS-based Mosaic of Antarctica (MOA) data sets: Continent-wide surface morphology and snow grain size. Remote Sensing of Environment 111(2-3): 242-257. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2006.12.020.
Scambos, T.A., R.E. Bell, R.B. Alley, S. Anandakrishnan, D.H. Bromwich, K. Brunt, K. Christianson, T. Creyts, S.B. Das, R. DeConto, and P. Dutrieux. 2017. How much, how fast?: A science review and outlook for research on the instability of Antarctica's Thwaites Glacier in the 21st century. Global and Planetary Change 153: 16-34. doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.04.008.
Scambos, T.A., G.G. Campbell, A. Pope, T. Haran, A. Muto, M. Lazzara, C.H. Reijmer, and M.R. Van den Broeke. 2018. Ultralow surface temperatures in East Antarctica from satellite thermal infrared mapping: The coldest places on Earth. Geophysical Research Letters 45(12): 6124-6133. doi:10.1029/2018GL078133.
Kevin SchaeferSchaefer, K., T. Zhang, L. Bruhwiler, A.P. Barrett. 2011. Amount and timing of permafrost carbon release in response to climate warming. Tellus B 63: 165-180. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0889.2011.00527.x.
Liu, L., K.M. Schaefer, T. Zhang, and J. Wahr. 2012. Estimating 1992–2000 average active layer thickness on the Alaskan North Slope from remotely sensed surface subsidence. Journal of Geophysical Research 117: F01005. doi:10.1029/2011JF002041.
Schaefer, K, C.R. Schwalm, C. Williams, M.A. Arain, A. Barr, J.M. Chen, K.J. Davis, D. Dimitrov, T.W. Hilton, D.Y. Hollinger, E. Humphreys, B. Poulter, B.M. Raczka, A.D. Richardson, A. Sahoo, P. Thornton, R. Vargas, H. Verbeeck, R. Anderson, I. Baker, T.A. Black, P. Bolstad, J. Chen, P.S. Curtis, A.R. Desai, M. Dietze, D. Dragoni, C. Gough, R.F. Grant, L. Gu, A. Jain, C. Kucharik, B. Law, S. Liu, E. Lokipitiya, H.A. Margolis, R. Matamala, J.H. McCaughey, R. Monson, J.W. Munger, W. Oechel, C. Peng, D.T. Price, D. Ricciuto, W.J. Riley, N. Roulet, H. Tian, C. Tonitto, M. Torn, E. Weng, X. Zhou. 2012. A model-data comparison of gross primary productivity: Results from the North American Carbon Program site synthesis. Journal of Geophysical Research 117: G03010. doi:10.1029/2012JG001960.
Schuster, P.F., K.M. Schaefer, G.R. Aiken, R. C. Antweiler, J.F. Dewild, J.D. Gryziec, A. Gusmeroli, G. Hugelius, E. Jafarov, D.P. Krabbenhoft, L. Liu, N. Herman-Mercer, C. Mu, D.A. Roth, T. Schaefer, R.G. Striegl, K.P. Wickland, and T. Zhang. 2018. Permafrost stores a globally significant amount of mercury. Geophysical Research Letters 45:, 1463-1471. doi:10.1002/2017GL075571.
Mark SerrezeSerreze, M.C., and R.G. Barry. 2014. The Arctic Climate System. Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, 404 pp.
Serreze, M.C. 2018. Brave New Arctic: The Untold Story of the Melting North, Princeton University Press, 255 pp.
Serreze, M.C., and R.S. Bradley. 1987. Radiation and cloud observations on a high Arctic plateau ice cap. Journal of Glaciology 33: 162-168. doi:10.3189/S0022143000008649.
Serreze, M.C., Box, J.E., Barry, R.G. and Walsh, J.E. 1993. Characteristics of Arctic synoptic activity, 1952-1989. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics 51: 147-164. doi:10.1007/BF01030491.
Serreze, M.C., J.E. Walsh, F.S. Chapin III, T. Osterkamp, M. Dyurgerov, V. Romonovsky, W.C. Oechel, J. Morison, T. Zhang, and R.G. Barry. 2000. Observational evidence of recent change in the northern high latitude environment. Climatic Change 46: 159-207. doi:10.1023/A:1005504031923.
Serreze, M.C., M.P. Clark, and A. Frei. 2001. Characteristics of large snowfall events in the montane western United States as examined using snowpack telemetry (SNOTEL) data. Water Resources Research 37: 675-688. doi:10.1029/2000WR900307.
Serreze, M.C., A.P. Barrett, J.C. Stroeve, D.M. Kindig, and M. Holland. 2009. Emerging Arctic amplification as seen in the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis. The Cryosphere 3: 9-11. doi:10.5194/tc-3-11-2009.
Serreze, M.C., E.N. Cassano, A. Crawford, J.J. Cassano, and C. Zhang. 2026. The observed evolution of Arctic amplification over the past 45 years. The Cryosphere 20: 411-425. doi:10.5194/tc-20-411-2026.
Julienne StroeveStroeve, J., M.M. Holland, W. Meier, T. Scambos, and M. Serreze. 2007. Arctic sea ice decline: Faster than forecast. Geophysical Research Letters 34: L09501. doi:10.1029/2007GL029703.
Stroeve, J.C., M.C. Serreze, M.M. Holland, J.E. Kay, J. Malanik, and A.P. Barrett. 2012. The Arctic’s rapidly shrinking sea ice cover: a research synthesis. Climatic Change 110: 1005-1027. doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0101-1.
Serreze, M.C., M.M. Holland, and J. Stroeve. 2007. Perspectives on the Arctic’s shrinking sea-Ice cover. Science 315(5818): 1533-1536. doi:10.1126/science.1139426.
Serreze, M.C., A.P. Barrett, J.C. Stroeve, D.N. Kindig, and M.M. Holland. 2009. The emergence of surface-based Arctic amplification. The Cryosphere 3(1): 11-19. doi:10.5194/tc-3-11-2009.
Stroeve, J., and D. Notz. 2018. Changing state of Arctic sea ice across all seasons. Environmental Research Letters 13: 103001. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aade56.
Stroeve, J.C., V. Kattsov, A. Barrett, M. Serreze, T. Pavlova, M. Holland, and W.N. Meier. 2012. Trends in Arctic sea ice extent from CMIP5, CMIP3 and observations. Geophysical Research Letters 39: L16502
doi:10.1029/2012GL052676.
Contributions to the Arctic Report Card (ARC)| # | Наименование новости | Тональность | Информативность | Дата публикации |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NSIDC turns 50 | 0 | 11.4 | 14-09-2026 |
| 2 | Navigating New Ways of Arctic Research | 0 | 9.71 | 10-09-2026 |
| 3 | Arctic sea ice record low maximum strikes again | 0 | 9.3 | 26-03-2026 |
| 4 | Antarctic sea ice extent arrives at a near-average minimum | 0 | 9.8 | 07-03-2026 |
| 5 | Fifty years of change in the cryosphere | 0 | 9.5 | 19-08-2026 |
| 6 | Arctic sea ice has reached minimum extent for 2026; Antarctic sea ice maximum most likely reached as well | 0 | 9.59 | 22-09-2026 |
| 7 | Arctic Report Card: A Close Watch on a Warming Region | 0 | 9.5 | 01-04-2026 |
| 8 | To see or not to see: The reality of sea level rise | 0 | 9.1 | 01-10-2026 |
| 9 | Длительность сезона таяния в Арктике стабилизировалась | 0 | 20.5 | 25-09-2026 |
| 10 | Американские климатологи обнаружили, что многолетний тренд на увеличение продолжительности сезона ... | 0 | 11.04 | 27-09-2026 |