Просмотр новости
Найдите то, что Вас интересует
Спутники
РН
SpaceX
Роскосмос
NASA
СпутникиРНSpaceXРоскосмосNASABigots try to be cagey. They use dog whistles that encode their animus. They make political pronouncements that, while superficially anodyne, signal which demographic groups are on their team—and which ones aren’t. Courts, though, aren’t readily tricked. Or at least they’re not supposed to be. Because they understand that assessing animus depends on context, they rely on legal tools—like discovery, evidence, and juries—to facilitate a searching examination of that context. So it’s surprising and distressing when, suddenly, they start missing all the telltale signs. This is precisely what’s happening in cases involving Jews.This essay identifies, endeavors to understand, and rebuts the emerging “Anti-Zionism Exception” to anti-discrimination assessments and civil rights law. Using Torres v Carlson, a factually jarring but legally straightforward case arising out of the violent seizure of Hamilton Hall at Columbia University, we demonstrate that the court's key rulings—including...