Вход на сайт

Просмотр новости

Найдите то, что Вас интересует

The ‘Cox Effect’ Continues: Anthropic Brushes Off Vicarious Infringement Claims In Music Publishers’ High-Stakes Copyright Suit

Дата публикации: 29-05-2026 05:00:33

The “Cox effect” continues to ripple across the music industry litigation landscape. In the latest development, Anthropic has shrugged off vicarious liability in the newer copyright infringement suit it’s facing from major music publishers including Concord. Judge Eumi K. Lee just recently signed a related order, thereby approving the publisher plaintiffs’ voluntary dismissal of a […]

Основное содержимое страницы с новостью.

Anthropic music publishers lawsuit

The Phillip Burton Federal Building. Photo Credit: Marincyclist

The “Cox effect” continues to ripple across the music industry litigation landscape. In the latest development, Anthropic has shrugged off vicarious liability in the newer copyright infringement suit it’s facing from major music publishers including Concord.

Judge Eumi K. Lee just recently signed a related order, thereby approving the publisher plaintiffs’ voluntary dismissal of a vicarious infringement claim without prejudice.

As described in the original complaint, which arrived this past January, the filing parties were specifically accusing the AI giant of being vicariously liable for users’ and licensees’ alleged infringement of protected lyrics in Claude outputs.

“Anthropic has refused to take reasonable steps to prevent the widespread infringement by users of its AI models. As a direct and proximate result of such refusal, users of Anthropic’s AI models have infringed Publishers’ copyrights in the musical compositions,” the plaintiffs wrote.

Now, the claim is no more; Concord and others have also submitted an amended complaint that’s identical to the prior iteration save the removal of the vicarious infringement component.

The development didn’t arrive out of left field. In the first place, the publishers last month voluntarily dropped (with prejudice) contributory and vicarious claims from their older, technically distinct suit against Anthropic.

And as many know, the move followed the unanimous Supreme Court decision in favor of Cox Communications in a marathon major-label infringement dispute – a decision that significantly narrowed the scope of secondary liability.

It’d be difficult to understate the precedent’s music-world impact, which is readily apparent not only here, but in several ISP infringement cases, Epidemic’s long-running Meta legal battle, a showdown with stream-ripper Yout, and the X copyright confrontation.

With that, the focus in the publishers’ Anthropic complaints – plus a separate-but-similar action from BMG – has shifted to core allegations of direct training-related infringement, torrenting, and alleged DMCA violations concerning a dramatically increased number of works.

Meanwhile, Judge Lee is presiding over all three suits and, as a recent order described in greater detail, is therefore taking scheduling steps (including temporarily staying the cases and delaying certain deadlines) to “facilitate coordination between the related actions.”

An important closing note: Though the publishers axed both their vicarious and contributory infringement claims in the older Anthropic complaint, a contributory claim is still part of the newer suit.

However, as we touched on in related coverage, this claim has been adjusted to focus on alleged “contributory infringement by torrenting” on the part of Anthropic co-founders Dario Amodei and Benjamin Mann.

“Dr. Amodei and Mr. Mann each knew that they were directing the Anthropic employees working under them to make unlawful copies from known pirated sources and to distribute those unlawful copies further,” the amended suit states.

“Accordingly, Dr. Amodei and Mr. Mann are contributorily liable for the infringement of Publishers’ copyrighted musical compositions via torrenting, including the song lyrics contained therein,” the complaint proceeds.

Схожие новости

#Наименование новостиТональностьИнформативностьДата публикации
1Anthropic Goes ‘Mano-a-Mano’ Against Music Industry Power Attorney Donald Passman07.7615-07-2026
2Sorry, Artists: Google Says They Have ‘A Broad License’ to Use YouTube-Uploaded Music to Train Their AI-2610-06-2026
3Judge approves Anthropic’s $1.5B settlement of authors’ AI copyright lawsuit — first major case to settle0720-07-2026
4Meta Hits Back Against Wixen Music Publishing’s $70 Million ‘AI Replacement’ Infringement Suit0715-05-2026
5Federal Judge Dismisses Spotify Class Action Suit Alleging ‘Mass-Scale Fraudulent Streaming’ on Drake’s Catalog0522-06-2026
629 Organizations Rally Behind ‘No Consent, No Deal’ AI Approach, Call on Labels and Publishers to End ‘Default Opt-Ins,’ ‘Forced AI Clauses,’ and More5723-06-2026
7Federal Judge Tees Up Possible Dismissal of Years-Old Patent Infringement Lawsuit Against BMG0511-06-2026
8Music Publishers, X End Copyright And Antitrust Fights 0717-07-2026
9AFM Sues Universal Music, Warner Music for Failing ‘To Share in the Settlement Proceeds and Future Revenue’ Under Their Suno and Udio Deals0806-06-2026
10The AFM’s AI Lawsuit Is Now Part of ‘A Global Fight’ — UK’s Musicians’ Union Urges Others to ‘Take on Major Corporations Who Intend to Exploit Their Rights Without Consent’5713-06-2026

Классификация: Пресс-релизы. Схожих патентов: 0. Схожих новостей: 10. Тональность: 0. Информативность: 7. Источник: www.digitalmusicnews.com.