Вход на сайт

Просмотр новости

Найдите то, что Вас интересует

Delhi HC restrains Ilaiyaraaja from broadcasting songs from 134 films in Saregama copyright dispute

Дата публикации: 01-07-2026 22:50:35

The court held that Ilaiyaraaja’s rights under the Copyright Act were confined to the musical compositions and exploitation of the disputed sound recordings would amount to copyright infringement

Основное содержимое страницы с новостью.

Music composer Ilaiyaraaja. File

Music composer Ilaiyaraaja. File | Photo Credit: ANI

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday (July 1, 2026) ruled in favour of music label Saregama India Ltd. in its copyright dispute with composer Ilaiyaraaja, restraining him from broadcasting or communicating the songs in question from 134 films dating back to 1976, till further orders.

Justice Tushar Rao Gedela held that while Mr. Ilaiyaraaja continues to enjoy copyright over the musical compositions he created, those rights do not extend to the sound recordings incorporated in films, the copyright in which vests with the producer, Saregama.

“The right of the defendant/Ilaiyaraaja to the extent conferred by Section 14(a) of the (Copyright) Act of the right to adaptation is limited to the extent of “musical work”, that is, the musical composition of the songs claimed to have been infringed, sans the lyrics,” the court said.

Saregama had told the court that between 1976 and 2001 it entered into assignment agreements with producers of several cinematograph films. By virtue of these agreements, it claimed ownership of the copyrights in the sound recordings as well as the underlying musical and literary works of songs forming part of those films.

The company alleged that it recently came across the infringing use of the copyrighted works by Mr. Ilaiyaraaja by uploading the same on various platforms like Amazon music, iTunes, Jio Saavan etc. It also alleged Mr. Ilaiyaraaja of having made ownership claims over the infringing content.

The court held that Mr. Ilaiyaraaja’s rights under the Copyright Act were confined to the musical compositions and that any exploitation of the disputed sound recordings would, prima facie, amount to copyright infringement.

“Since there is no denial to the broadcasting of songs which are subject matter of the suit referred cinematograph films, the defendant/Ilaiyaraaja, prima facie, appears to be indulging in acts which would tantamount to infringement,” the court added.

The order covers an extensive list of 134 films, including well-known titles such as Annakkili (1976), 16 Vayathiniley (1977), Mullum Malarum (1978), Netrikkann (1981), and Raaja Paarvai (1981).

Published - July 02, 2026 04:20 am IST

Схожие новости

#Наименование новостиТональностьИнформативностьДата публикации
1Суд отказал в отмене обеспечительных мер "Сахалин-шельф-сервис" по иску ГП0018-04-2025
2Нил Янг отозвал иск к Трампу за использование двух песен без согласия автора0008-12-2020
3Суд в Москве обязал Google снять ограничения на просмотр фильма "Беслан" на YouTube0022-10-2020
4Суд отклонил жалобу защиты Евгения Ройзмана на арест0017-03-2023
5Суд не стал рассматривать иск сына Цоя к студии режиссера Учителя и кинопрокатчикам0020-11-2020
6Мосгорсуд отказался заблокировать YouTube в России по иску компании "Онтаргет"0023-07-2020
7Мосгорсуд защитил исключительное право издательства "Просвещение" на учебники0507-07-2026
8📉 Суд поставил точку в деле о национализации группы «Ариант»0501-07-2026
9Court rules against cruise lines in Cuban confiscation case0521-05-2026

Классификация: . Схожих патентов: 0. Схожих новостей: 9. Тональность: 0. Информативность: 7. Источник: www.thehindu.com.