Вход на сайт

Просмотр новости

Найдите то, что Вас интересует

Technical books that have been read cover to cover

Дата публикации: 11-07-2026 08:09:27



Основное содержимое страницы с новостью.

  • Context: Other 
  • Thread starter Thread starter loop quantum gravity
  • Start date Start date Friday, 12:48 AM

Join the discussion

Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.

Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips

I would like to know which technical books have you read cover to cover and solved the problems with or without external help from outside?

So far I only finished reading Srednicki's and Peskin's & Schroeder's.

Iv'e got a lot of stuff to read ad infinitum
:oldbiggrin:

I also completed reading a lot of technical books in Hebrew from the OU in math.
Contribue your input,
Cheers! but don't drink alcohol and derive...
:cool:

All of the problems? No one does every exercise, do they?

I'm pretty sure we did Goodman, Fourier Optics, cover to cover at school. Also maybe Protter-Morrey, Calculus, in high school. Otherwise I've found it very rare for an instructor not to exclude parts.

In my working life, probably just Colonel Wm. T. McLyman, Transformer and Inductor Design Handbook. Neither a great feat nor a great book.

Cover to cover just isn't my style, usually some of it is a waste of effort.

Last edited: Friday, 3:55 PM

DaveE said:

All of the problems? No one does every exercise, do they?

I'm pretty sure we did Goodman, Fourier Optics, cover to cover at school. Also maybe Protter-Morrey, Calculus, in high school. Otherwise I've found it very rare for an instructor not to exclude parts.

In my working life, probably just Colonel Wm. T. McLyman, Transformer and Inductor Design Handbook. Neither a great feat nor a great book.

Cover to cover just isn't my style, usually some of it is a waste of effort.

For my UG studies in Newtonian mechanics for physicists I did the exercises by myself, with the help from some people in the net back then (I am quite old).
I am not sure if I ever finished reading that book, but I am quite sure that I did come to do all the exercises that involved SR (I am refering to the blue old edition of Kleppner and Kolenkow).
But the only books that I can attest to read cover to cover are the ones above. And it took me some time to digest all the derivations.
I also tried to read Cohen-Tannodji vol 1 and 2 but it was too much; now I see there is a new edition of cohen-tannodji and also SM.

No rest for the wicked...
:oldbiggrin:

loop quantum gravity said:

For my UG studies in Newtonian mechanics for physicists I did the exercises by myself, with the help from some people in the net back then (I am quite old).
I am not sure if I ever finished reading that book, but I am quite sure that I did come to do all the exercises that involved SR (I am refering to the blue old edition of Kleppner and Kolenkow).
But the only books that I can attest to read cover to cover are the ones above. And it took me some time to digest all the derivations.
I also tried to read Cohen-Tannodji vol 1 and 2 but it was too much; now I see there is a new edition of cohen-tannodji and also SM.

No rest for the wicked...
:oldbiggrin:

I have a friend that during undergrad did all of the problems of Cohen-Tannoudji.

Схожие новости

#Наименование новостиТональностьИнформативностьДата публикации
10029-04-2026
20002-04-2026
30020-03-2026
40024-10-2018
5В Fоrma подсчитали, сколько книг россияне читают за год0524-06-2026
6Learning linear algebra0513-07-2026
7Test0006-05-2026
8Рецензии на прочитанные книги: 33-й десяток0516-06-2026
90016-02-2026

Классификация: . Схожих патентов: 0. Схожих новостей: 9. Тональность: 0. Информативность: 5. Источник: www.physicsforums.com.