The Karnataka High Court has halted the state government's move to withdraw prosecution in 52 criminal cases, including those involving influential individuals and protests. A public interest litigation challenged the notification, alleging it was arbitrary and aimed at appeasing certain groups. The court issued notices and directed prosecutors not to act on the order, pending a response from the government. The opposition BJP criticized the decision as 'toxic appeasement politics'.
Bengaluru: The Karnataka High Court on Thursday stayed a state government notification providing for the withdrawal of prosecution in 52 criminal cases, dealing a setback to the ruling Congress government.
A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice K.S. Hemalekha issued notices to the state government and the Prosecution Department on a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by advocate Girish Bharadwaj challenging the notification.
The petitioner alleged that the government order sought to withdraw cases involving "influential people" capable of influencing government decisions and contended that the exercise was arbitrary and contrary to law.
Pending further hearing, the Bench directed that no public prosecutor shall act upon the government notification. It also asked the state to file its response within two weeks and posted the matter for hearing on July 27.
On May 21, the Cabinet, then chaired by Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, approved the withdrawal of criminal cases against individuals involved in a range of protests and incidents, including pro-Kannada agitations, Cauvery and Kalasa-Banduri protests, as well as cases relating to the 2002 riots in Aland in Kalaburagi district.
Home Minister Priyank Kharge said the government followed the due process of law, as it did in earlier instances, and he would respond after examining the court order. The cases withdrawn included BJP workers, too, he added.
The Opposition BJP welcomed the High Court's interim order, describing the Cabinet's decision as an instance of "toxic appeasement politics" aimed at consolidating its vote bank.
"The judiciary has sent a clear message: the Constitution of India cannot be mortgaged for Congress's vote-bank politics," the party said in a post on X.
The BJP alleged that the Siddaramaiah-DK Shivakumar government misused Section 321 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to facilitate the withdrawal of cases, claiming the move violated established legal principles and undermined the rule of law.
| # | Наименование новости | Тональность | Информативность | Дата публикации |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Karnataka govt seeks caste, income details in Gruha Jyoti drive; sparks BJP protest | 0 | 7 | 01-07-2026 |
| 2 | Суд прекратил уголовное преследование обвиняемых по делу о крушении Boeing в Казани | 0 | 0 | 24-01-2020 |
| 3 | Госадвокатура Испании просит суд приостановить действие ордера на арест Пучдемона | 0 | 0 | 03-01-2020 |
| 4 | Конституционный суд приостановил дело Кочаряна | 0 | 0 | 18-07-2019 |
| 5 | Суд отказался продлевать срок ареста счетов по делу Абызова | 0 | 0 | 22-08-2019 |
| 6 | Supreme Court stays Madras High Court order banning cow slaughter in Tamil Nadu | 0 | 5 | 13-07-2026 |
| 7 | Maharashtra puts new RTI Rules on hold after Hazare's agitation threat | 0 | 7 | 02-07-2026 |
| 8 | CBS: прокуратура США отозвала обвинения против Кевина Спейси | 0 | 0 | 17-07-2019 |
| 9 | Защита одного из фигурантов дела "Сети" в Петербурге заявила отвод суду | 0 | 0 | 26-02-2020 |
| 10 | Суд приостановил производство по ходатайству Улюкаева о снятии с него судимости | 0 | 0 | 10-03-2025 |